1. Read: Ch 4; Ravasio, "What is the Connection Between Art and Morality?"
For discussion:
I. Interaction between artistic and moral value
A. Anti-interactionism
1. What is the basic thesis of anti-interactionism?
2. How do radical autonomism and moderate autonomism differ?
B. Interactionism
1. What is the basic thesis of interactionism?
2. What is the "emotional uptake argument" of moderate moralism?
3. What criticisms can we raise of moderate moralism? (Uptake despite flaw)
4. What is the central thesis of ethicism?
5. How might we critique ethicism? (Circularity?; non-ethical nature of imaginary objects?)
6. What is the basic thesis of immoralism (along with any potential critiques)? (Cog. Immoral. --Merely apparent immorality?)
II. Art and moral knowledge: can art inform or shape our moral outlook?
1. On what bases do anti-interactionists reject the claim that art can teach us anything about morality?
2. How does Nussbaum (an interactionist/moderate moralist) reply?